The cost offset concentrates in the comorbid segments. This sizes those segments and shows the net budget impact of treating each — so targeting beats blanket coverage.
Offset = medical spending the drug avoids, as a share of drug cost. Edit any cell. Offsets are cumulative/long-run; short-term they're near zero (spend rises first).
| Obese segment | Share | Treated | Offset % | Net $/member | Total net / yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total |
CVD-segment long-run offset (24%) is from the SELECT trial CEA (avoided diabetes 18.5% + CV events 3.8% + CKD 1.6%); other segments are literature-informed and editable.
The point isn't "GLP-1s pay for themselves" — they don't, on a Medicaid budget. Even at the BALANCE price with the best-segment 24% long-run offset, net cost per member stays well above zero. The point is where the cost is most justified: the diabetes and CVD segments (~27% of obese members) carry the real offset and clinical benefit, so a targeted policy is far cheaper per unit of value than blanket coverage — and the obese-only 39% is where short-term offset is ≈0.
Sources: NHANES 2021–23 (segment shares), SELECT trial CEA (offset), KFF / CMS BALANCE (Medicaid price & coverage, Jan 2026). Calibrated estimate on public data — not a predictive model. Prototype; not for billing.